We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 7.4.63 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 7.4.63, updated 2026-06-19.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Trial converts to a charge
This app is a scam so beware — If you download this app and initiate a free trial, they will still bill you even if you cancel within the trial period. The company is a scam and you’ll be forced to dispute charges on your credit card with…
Bad experience — This app did not work correctly, it was too finicky. It made it difficult to create a photo collage. It said I had a free trial but immediately charged me $10.95 when the price it gave me was $4.99. I paid double & I…
Scam — I was told not to get charged for the next 7 days if I tried the free trial and as soon I got it it charged me 15$ there such liars
Hard to cancel
Don’t do it — I tried to cancel this and still got charged. It is terrible and that’s why I tried to cancel right away. Stupid Apple charged me anyway and wouldn’t refund me. Never trying any apps ever again . Can’t trust Apple to do the…
Con — They won’t let me cancel this subscription. I had to change my bank account number to cancel it
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
False Advertising — The app is free and says you can make collages for free, but then tries to make you pay for your collage. And the collages aren’t even good or unique. stupid app. don’t recommend.
Waste of time not free — Garbage bait and switch
Advertised as Free — This was advertised as free and it is anything but. It understand paying for special functions in the app but to simply save a photo you have to pay.
Paywall blocks the basics
EVERYTHING IS BEHIND A PAYWALL — DO NOT GET THIS IF YOU WANT A FREE COLLAGE MAKER 😡😡
Too many ads. — Update: Now you can’t do anything in the app without a subscription. Easily deleted for me. Can't even combine photos without accidentally clicking on on of the 50 ads that pops up.
Pay to use — You literally can’t do anything besides add the pictures to edit without paying a subscription. You can’t save or share, other apps I’ve used at least let you save your first few creations for free.
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 3 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.