DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Planner 5D: AI Home Design
Planner5D, UAB · Lifestyle

Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-06 from 1,483 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

Analyzed automaticallyConfidence: Medium3 signal sources1,483 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-06
 Which version this describes

App Store

This analysis describes version 5.9.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 5.10.0, updated 2026-09-28.

The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 5.9.0, not the version now listed on the store.

Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:

Version 5.10.0 · 2026-09-28
New version is released. Speed and functionality improvements. Check Planner 5D Interior Design blog to find more details about each important release. Feel free to send a message to our support team in the app in case of any questions.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 2.98.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 2.98.0, updated 2026-10-06.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

The catch list 1

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Reported by users: Reports of unexpected charges
Reported by 43 usersReported by users, not measured — nothing we can inspect could show this either wayview evidence
A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Raised by 43 distinct reviewers — 8.0% of the 536 reviews scanned on this store leg (App Store).

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 3

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Trial converts to a charge
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The free trial demands a payment method up front and/or rolls into a paid subscription with no usable warning.
What we saw: Trial converts to a charge: raised by 27 distinct reviewers (5.0% of 536 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Hard to cancel
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
What we saw: Hard to cancel: raised by 11 distinct reviewers (2.1% of 536 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Paywall blocks the basics
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
What we saw: Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 9 distinct reviewers (1.7% of 536 reviews scanned)

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Reports of unexpected charges

these people will keep charging your account no matter if you cancel or not. $66 is a lot of money for them just to keep charging your account

1★ · Google Play · 2026-10-05

be very careful of billing/account policies. Surprisingly difficult to cancel your subscription and not possible to be refunded. must cancel ONLY from the OS/interface you registered from (i.e. if registered via app can't cancel via web…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-13

Exorbitant price and terrible support — Requires $20 on top of a $50 subscription just to scan your home. I immediately deleted the app and forgot about it. Accidentally didn’t cancel the free trial since I have 100 other things to worry…

1★ · App Store · 2026-09-12

Trial converts to a charge

Scammed me! — I chose a 7 day free trial and they immediately charged me $120 for the year. They will not refund me. 0 stars

1★ · App Store · 2026-09-29

Too hard — You have to be a professional to be able to operate this app, not enjoying and now my free trial has been charged

1★ · App Store · 2026-09-26

Crazyness — Idk how it got my bank info from the free trial but somehow it charged my apple account connected to my bank $130 don’t fall for this scam

1★ · App Store · 2026-09-24

Hard to cancel

be very careful of billing/account policies. Surprisingly difficult to cancel your subscription and not possible to be refunded. must cancel ONLY from the OS/interface you registered from (i.e. if registered via app can't cancel via web…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-13

Honest help — Honestly if you want your app to succeed you would let people use it and if they want premium options like decorating or something of that nature then make them pay. Not being able to use it at all without paying is not a…

1★ · App Store · 2026-07-03

Impossible to Cancel Subscription — I’ve been trying to cancel my subscription for over a year, but there is no clear way to do it. It doesn’t appear in my Apple subscriptions, and your website doesn’t provide any cancellation option…

1★ · App Store · 2026-07-01

Paywall blocks the basics

No free version — It claims there’s a free version but there isn’t. After you answer a bunch of questions it wants you to start a free trial, after which, according to the user reviews, it will charge you regardless of whether you…

1★ · App Store · 2026-09-02

Have to pay for everything — You have to pay for everything, the only thing you can do is make the outline of the room. No doors, no windows, no furniture unless you pay 119$. If there were even just minimal features like base furniture…

1★ · App Store · 2026-07-02

paywall — they make it seem as though the app is free but its locked behind a paywall. i would give 0 stars if possible.

1★ · App Store · 2026-06-20

What this app sells

Every purchase the store discloses. Store listing
 What this app sells

From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.

Subscriptions7
Interior design: weekly useWeekly$7.99
House design: monthly useMonthly$19.99
Full catalog for 30 daysMonthly$6.99
Interior design: annual useYearly$69.99
Interior design: annual useYearly$119.99
Yearly SubscriptionYearly$29.99
Full catalog access for 1 yearYearly$15.99
This list is cut off. Apple shows at most 10 in-app purchases, and this app is at the limit — so it very likely sells more than we can see.
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-06 Version analyzed: 5.9.0 (App Store), 2.98.0 (Google Play)3 independent signals1,483 reviews scannedConfidence: MediumNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.