Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 522 user reviews. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 13.14.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 13.14.0, updated 2026-09-24.
What the analysis found
The catch list 3
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 1
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
Can’t cancel subscription — It’s very easy to subscribe but I can not figure out how to cancel. It tells you to do it a certain way but that does not work. Even if you delete your account. I do not recommend this app. There are other ones…
WARNING - FRAUD, SCAM — They charge you over 10$ a week and I warn you - it’s impossible to cancel. It will not show up in your subscriptions under Apple apps. It’s predatory. I’ve tried multiple times to cancel and even emailed and tried…
I keep getting charged and need it to be stopped now — I tried using the app to transfer music over but when i tried going into the app to cancel the trial and subscription there is no option for it why have an app where you cant cancel…
Reports of unexpected charges
Charged me after cancelling — Charged me $14 after cancelling the trial! Will be filing a dispute with the bank :)
Payments — Never responded to my email and never restored my subscription and still charging me
They charge you even if you cancel the free trial — Be aware. Yes it works and does what it advertises, but you get a one week free trial and they still charge you even if you cancel before the week is up! I canceled it the day after I…
Trial converts to a charge
Misleading — When you join the app in order to do anything they make you accept their free trial and immediately after accepting the FREE trial it charges you $12.99 like i don’t have that type of money to be spending on a subscription to…
Fraud — Tried to charge me for a free trial on the day the trial started now Apple won’t help me
attempted to charge my card for a free trial period — AI coded app, thief developer just don’t download it
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Deceptive Advertising On Its Subscription — From the second you open the app, it shoves in your face “Trial Enabled”. Then when you begin a transfer, it hits you with it again, then you sign up for the trial, and you see it’s just for…
DON’T DO THE TRIAL — Very shady bait and switch app that advertises a 7 day trial that then charges you $13 automatically. App actually worked for the most part, definitely not 100% accurately or fast at all, but I suppose it did mostly…
False Advertisement — It showed that it was a 7 day free trial and when you subscribe it charges you, on top of that the feedback button on the app just doesn’t work. I want my money back
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. One independent signal is read — user reviews — and each candidate finding is filed under the source that supports it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.