Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Decent app for tracking binder collection — I use this one just to track my binder collection. It shows the symbols on the cards along with the set name which makes finding the correct set easy when adding cards I get in bulk boxes. Only…
Ads Ads Ads — This use to be a great app to track my collection and it’s value. Ever since the devs revised the monetization plan I’m getting slammed with unskippable ads. It’s garbage and I’ve moved all my tracking to excel. Let me say…
Ok app — Interface isn’t too bad, could use a bit of tweeting. The subscription price to get rid of ads is ridiculous and I won’t be paying for it. Most of all this app needs to be able to trace first edition cards and unlimited run, not…
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.