Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Misleading advertising
If in fact they are selling on auction truly authentic items at low prices then yay it looks great! However, their ad for $50 is very misleading because it is a credit for a more expensive fee to become a member...So you don't actually…
It's gambling. You spend real money for bids with no guarantee you’ll actually win anything, so there’s real financial risk involved. The constant countdowns and “almost won” feeling are designed to keep people spending more money chasing…
if I could give negative stars, I would, but then you won't see this. polly is disingenuous at best. the "bidding" system is convoluted and they keep your points if you win or not. I don't know why such bait and switch sites are allowed…
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.