Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Misleading advertising
Bait and switch — You review the app and pay for a subscription before ever even using the app? I would give zero stars if I could
Not as advertised — Beware… False advertising!!! The ad I saw for this app said the app tells you if a supplement, its ingredients etc, are as the brand advertises. That’s not at all what this app does. You scan the supplement and it…
Misleading advertising, fake reviews — Wish I would’ve actually read the reviews first. Definitely not worth the money, inaccurate AI slop that tells you literally nothing. Massive waste of money. No studies, no evidence, not even…
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.