Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-05 from 1,031 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 1.101.00 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.101.00, updated 2026-09-22.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.100.05 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.100.05, updated 2026-09-21.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
This Started out for me as a click on a pop up advertisement. Glad I did. I really enjoy this game. There is a lot to do and never anything boring. Joining an Alliance is the best thing you can do. Give this game a try you will be…
Thanks for annoying the heck outta me in my other game, with your probably fake, nonstop ads. Payback time! Enjoy my gift to you!
Scam game where bots try to get you to join shady discord servers. Basically there are in game clans and if you join any of them then you'll get a notification instantly saying that if you don't join discord,gg/xyz within 5 minutes then…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
It's not the best game out there but it's interesting enough. Immediately decided that Saya is my favorite, however I have an issue... I don't want to hear the voices. Something about the dialog sounds stiff and truncated to me in a way I…
The ad game was far different from what the game in this app is. The ad is misleading! Waste of time!
i started playing it because of an ad but the game is completely different from what was shown in the ad false advertising and mediocre game not my type
Pay to progress
I started playing a month ago and I've had a really good time playing. but I'm over the fact that you have to pay at every turn to advance even a little. this game is basically a rip off. it would be different if they scaled up the…
Most the 5 star reviews are either bots or lying because this game is pay-to-win trash. A cheap game from Hong Kong that requires a player to constantly spend money for little to no progress. Some people have said they spent around 10…
The game itself is pretty fun. Getting higher rank characters is more difficult than most games like this but I don't mind that. It is heavy P2W. The main problem with the game is the bots. I'm getting discord requests all from bots. The…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.