We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 2026.3.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2026.3.4, updated 2026-04-08.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Too many ads — To many ads once again can’t do anything when every 5 seconds a pop up ad appears
Way too many ads and moments of trying to make me pay for stuff — It’s a qr reader and they are asking for a subscription service for this 🥀
Too many ads — Decent scanner, but multiple ads before you can use it. Very annoying! There were several codes it couldn’t decode.
Hard to cancel
Unwanted subscription — Somehow I got subscribed to this app and I cannot cancel it!
Don’t download — They make it impossible to cancel your subscription - you’ll be charged endlessly for a completely pointless app. Huge mistake.
Can’t cancel!! — I signed up for a free trial of Qrscan and it says easy to cancel. I no longer want this but can’t find where to cancel.
Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
Awful — The barcode function works (earning the one star) but the spam and popups to get you to subscribe is abysmal UX. Hiding the x using color matching to the background image is disgusting, anti-consumeristic and downright…
Notifications are insane — Sent 8 notifications at the same time asking me to upgrade and give feedback. Here’s my feedback
DO NOT download this app! IT SQUEEZES YOU FOR MONEY! — If you download this app, it won’t be long before you’ve paid $20 for a full year of the app. You basically can’t use any features of the app without entering a trial and they set the…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.