We scanned 400 user reviews and found no recurring complaint patterns. Not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reviewers report clear pricing
Truly excellent, wonderfully functional, loads things incredibly quickly and does exactly what I want it to do. I love that I can pay a one-time price for the premium version rather than having to pay a subscription. Definitely worth it.
I use the note feature to notate documents and being able to export those notes out was worth imo. the app is great I've used the free version for months, honestly happy to pay the one time price to support it
one of the best if not the best reader app i used in years, full version is one time payment completely worth it. including some AI features will me it cutting edge ,like recap , summary of chapter, export of notes even if by connecting…
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.