DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Rebrand - AI Logo Maker
HUBX · Lifestyle

Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-05 from 500 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

Analyzed automaticallyConfidence: High3 signal sources500 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-05
 Which version this describes

This analysis describes version 1.4.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 1.4.0, updated 2026-07-13.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

One source only — shown, not confirmed 3

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Trial converts to a charge
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The free trial demands a payment method up front and/or rolls into a paid subscription with no usable warning.
What we saw: Trial converts to a charge: raised by 17 distinct reviewers (3.4% of 500 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Hard to cancel
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
What we saw: Hard to cancel: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (1.4% of 500 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (1.6% of 500 reviews scanned)

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Trial converts to a charge

no customer service. cant click the send message on a cellular device due to its placement under the phones navigation buttons to even email them. it says 7 day free trial then charges you instantly. I have the screen shots! Deceptive…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-07

BEWARE. SCAM. They charged me in the free trial! I cancelled the next day of it. Your contact site has an inoperable SUBMIT button. so... Let it be known that I have placed your charge in dispute with my financial institution for your…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-04-23

3 day free trial was immediate pay — I was offered the 3 day free trial but was charged the same day. I don’t care for that…. *To the response: The initial prompt did not say 7 days… it said 3 days free trial and if in fact it was for 7…

2★ · App Store · 2026-06-30

Hard to cancel

Doesn't allow for you to upload pictures to add to a design and canceling the subscription has been a nightmare! Not worth it!!

1★ · Google Play · 2026-04-14

I didn't like it at All! and very difficult to cancel it.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-03-31

Cancel — Can’t cancel my subscription

1★ · App Store · 2026-06-09

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

poor. I wanted to cancell within 4 hours as it is advertised as free trial but I can't seem to cancell. I uninstalled the app but subscription does not cancell. I have now sent an email to their address requesting cancellation for the @…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-06-02

no customer service. cant click the send message on a cellular device due to its placement under the phones navigation buttons to even email them. it says 7 day free trial then charges you instantly. I have the screen shots! Deceptive…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-07

Nothing like the ad!! terrible results.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-03-31

What this app sells

Every purchase the store discloses. Store listing
 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-05 Version analyzed: 1.4.03 independent signals500 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.