DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Retake AI: Face & Photo Editor
Deep Flow Apps · Photo & Video

Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 442 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

Analyzed automaticallyConfidence: High3 signal sources442 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-04
 Which version this describes

This analysis describes version 4.1.9 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 4.1.9, updated 2026-09-30.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 3

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Hard to cancel
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
What we saw: Hard to cancel: raised by 23 distinct reviewers (5.2% of 442 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Trial converts to a charge
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The free trial demands a payment method up front and/or rolls into a paid subscription with no usable warning.
What we saw: Trial converts to a charge: raised by 12 distinct reviewers (2.7% of 442 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Reports of unexpected charges
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Surprise charges: raised by 22 distinct reviewers (5.0% of 442 reviews scanned)

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Hard to cancel

it won't let me cancel my subscription I haven't used this app in over 4 months and it bills me every week. I've went to the phone store and they don't know how to take it off either so I'm asking for you guys to cancel my subscription my…

2★ · Google Play · 2026-02-23

don't download this app... the 7.99 free trial does not turn into a 7.99 a month subscription like it leads you to believe. It is 7.99 a week + fee's so almost $9 a week total... absolutely ridiculous and almost impossible to cancel. I am…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-05-10

near impossible to cancel. it tells you (the app) they can't cancel you have to cancel through the app store than there is no option. this is like trying to find waldo!

1★ · Google Play · 2026-03-18

Trial converts to a charge

complete 🐂💩 they say "give it a try for free" but for you to give it that "free trial" you have to give them your credit card and create an account making it that much easier for them to continue billing you and don't forget to cancel…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-03-29

thieves. I ended the free trial date on day of last but they still charged me and refused to give me a refund. remind you I used this app once for 2 seconds during trial. DO NOT EVEN SIGN UP FOR THE FRE E TRIAL. THATS HOW THEY GET YOU.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-06-01

I was charged before the free trial ended. Cancel me and refund my money

1★ · Google Play · 2026-04-07

Reports of unexpected charges

Horrible experience. I've canceled my account and they're still charging me weekly. You cannot stop the payments from within the app Would not recommend to anyone

1★ · Google Play · 2026-05-26

They continued to charge my account even though I had reached out to their customer support asking for a refund and requested they immediately cancel my account because their app is terrible. DO NOT INSTALL THIS SCAM ON YOUR PHONE

1★ · Google Play · 2026-03-17

signed up for the 7 day free trial and was charged the full price the same day and I'm unable to get a refund. Misleading and false advertisement just to take your money.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-05

What this app sells

Every purchase the store discloses. Store listing
 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-04 Version analyzed: 4.1.93 independent signals442 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.