DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Roadtrippers - Trip Planner
Roadtrippers · Lifestyle

Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-05 from 922 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

Analyzed automaticallyConfidence: High3 signal sources922 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-05
 Which version this describes

App Store

This analysis describes version 6.4.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 6.4.1, updated 2026-10-02.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 3.1.0.6324 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 3.1.0.6324, updated 2026-09-15.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 7

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Trial converts to a charge
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The free trial demands a payment method up front and/or rolls into a paid subscription with no usable warning.
What we saw: Trial converts to a charge: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (1.2% of 514 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Hard to cancel
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
What we saw: Hard to cancel: raised by 11 distinct reviewers (2.1% of 514 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (1.6% of 514 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Paywall blocks the basics
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
What we saw: Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 25 distinct reviewers (4.9% of 514 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Price keeps rising
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The price of the paid tier has been raised on existing users.
What we saw: Price keeps rising: raised by 15 distinct reviewers (2.9% of 514 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Declining an upgrade is written as a loss ('No thanks, I don't want to improve'), or users report being repeatedly pushed to subscribe during normal use.
What we saw: Constant upsell pressure: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (1.0% of 514 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Reports of unexpected charges
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Surprise charges: raised by 22 distinct reviewers (4.3% of 514 reviews scanned)

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Trial converts to a charge

The app is pretty cool and is a good deal if you do lots of roadtrips. The BIG dislikes for me is it doesn't connect to the nav screen on my car. I canceled on the last day of my free trial and got charged anyway... super not cool. So if…

2★ · Google Play · 2024-07-13

I used to love the free version of this app, but now I cannot use it. The app is forcing me to sign up for a "free trial" for a premium account and enter a credit card number. I will be uninstalling this app as soon as I finish this review.

2★ · Google Play · 2025-04-23

Did Not Honor 7 Day Free Trial — I went into the app on Sept. 20th for a 7 day free trial and they charged me the yearly fee to renew on Sept. 11, 2027. I have’t even had the app for more than 4-5 days. Have to go through the hassle of…

1★ · App Store · 2026-09-24

Hard to cancel

I will be cancelling! I can't map out my route without having to pay ridiculous membership fees for this app. I can't even cancel through my settings I actually have to email them and ask permission to cancel because I don't have an…

1★ · Google Play · 2025-05-26

Bad functionality and billing problems. Can't find an address or phone number to dispute charges. Confusing to cancel subscription. Don't recommend.

1★ · Google Play · 2025-10-21

I have been unable to cancel. I sold my RV two years ago due to cancer and can't find how to cancel on the app or website. Beware, I'm in, but I can't get out.

1★ · Google Play · 2025-12-06

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

I paid for full membership under the impression I can use the ap offline as a GPS... not. If you aren't online you have nothing. misleading advertising. This app can't tell me where to find potable water. The most common sense necessities…

1★ · Google Play · 2025-11-03

Sucks , bait and switch. Has very limited places

1★ · Google Play · 2024-12-04

Free trial doesn’t give you all premium perks — Free trial is only if you sign up for the premium annual membership and you still don’t get all the perks associated with that level. Classic bait and switch. Hope the app is better than the…

1★ · App Store · 2026-08-28

Paywall blocks the basics

Still haven't found a way to stop their constant Emails. You have to pay for anything useful

1★ · Google Play · 2025-03-15

so functions behind a paywall

1★ · Google Play · 2026-07-20

What even is the point of this app. They lock your trips behind a paywall, literally cannot access anything. Subscription slop.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-07-07

Price keeps rising

Unauthorized charges — Keep increasing subscription from $29 to $59 over last 5 years. Subscription doesn’t show under Apple subscriptions for you to catch it. I was charged for 5 years and didn’t know.

1★ · App Store · 2026-03-22

Great app until they locked my routes and raised the membership fee — I traveled across the country 4 times and planned all my routes with this app. The original membership fee was around $30 for the year which was reasonable. I have…

2★ · App Store · 2025-08-19

It’s a scam — Changed their service with zero notification handcuffing use of the app and holding data hostage without upgrading to their premium service. This is a scam. Update: Roadtrippers is ok with raising prices for the same…

1★ · App Store · 2025-05-05

Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording

I really wanted to try this app for a very large across Canada camping trip. I couldn't even use it. I go to start a trip and it keeps asking me to pay for an upgrade. why would I pay for an upgrade when I can't even preview the app?…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-06-14

Couldn't actually get it to work. Every time I tried to put in a route it asked me to sign up for premium so seems like it only works if you pay

1★ · Google Play · 2025-07-13

hate what you've done app. everytime I select "plan myself" a pop-up for premium appears and nothing else. planning can't be done without premium in the app.

1★ · Google Play · 2025-06-12

Reports of unexpected charges

App dosent work with android and the free trial is a out right lie. was charged and refused a refund. My experience was awful and I would not recommend this app to anyone. Zero attempt to make this right after disputing it.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-06-17

THEY STEAL YOUR MONEY

1★ · Google Play · 2026-06-02

They force you to do a trial subscription to view site, and never alerted as to when my account would be charged. The charge hit this morning. I'd like to cancel, but they already charged.

1★ · Google Play · 2024-12-29

What this app sells

Every purchase the store discloses. Store listing
 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-05 Version analyzed: 6.4.1 (App Store), 3.1.0.6324 (Google Play)3 independent signals922 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.