Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 414 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 1.1.117 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.1.118, updated 2026-09-28.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 1.1.117, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Version 1.1.118 · 2026-09-28
No release notes were provided for this version.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Paywall blocks the basics
Just one big scam. You have to pay to read messages. Which I did. Only to find out everyone who will actually respond to me is a bot or scammer. I had this for three months and didn't even come close to finding a roommate or place. If you…
total SCAM of an application. do not waste your time and hopes on this app. they let you post for free but your incoming inquiries or messages are locked behind a paywall - if you try to include info for your listing, they delete numbers…
Disgusting practice of hiding messaging behind a paywall. Absolutely horrid.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Warning, full of Bots. you sign up and you put your ad in there that you're looking for a room and there's other people that are soliciting ADS that have rooms. But when you try to connect to them, they're fake accounts, they all look…
Fake ads to get you to pay money for zero service. Total data-collecting scam. Zero stars
They charge $29.99 just to put your name in, what to narrow your search ,more money, before you know it you have to spend over $50. .This is not explained up front. Bait and switch!!!!!!!
Hard to cancel
BUYER BEWARE! PLEASE DO NOT DOWNLOAD THIS APP. Awful app to deal with, also a scam. It doesn't show up it is even a subscription, yet they kept pulling from my bank account, and there is no way to cancel.
They make it extremely hard to Cancel Subscription! they charge for messaging services! This app is FULL of bots to entice you to pat for fake messages!
Buyer beware, it's very difficult to cancel subscription. It's easy to use but no luck with quality tenant options. Hence I canceled and they kept charging my Amex card via my Google Play store. I sent a screen shot of my cancelation…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.