Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Pay to progress
its very much pay to win. if you have a card attached and like the game then you are going to spend. its also very expensive and the marketing is strategic, you will get free "xp" for free by doing quest but if you complete all the free…
P2W game in the end, you need to pay if you want "IMT" Heroes that actually OP AF. you got lu bu? you need at least 6 of them to makes him stronger. What a shame dev just a greedy MF!
P2W where a new player joined the server and 2 days later they're already one of those dominating the leader boards with almost maxed out heroes.
What this app sells
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.