We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 1.9.8 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.9.8, updated 2026-07-28.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Trial converts to a charge
Sneaky — I thought I was signing up for a free trial and was charged a premium subscription. Tried to contact them with now luck.
Was supposed to be a free trial, it also didn’t work — It advertised a free trial but charged me $9.99. I’ve requested a refund. But even with that it displayed the demo screen on my TV but would never play my video.
SCAM and does not work!!!! Don’t use this app! — I got this app just an hour ago and connected to my TV. Then the app said that there is a 3-day FREE TRIAL option and I am gonna be charged after 3 days. I chose this option and my card got…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Useless & ripoff! — I paid 19.99 for a Year subscription and it it’s completely useless because there is a minute delay so I can’t watch anything through screen mirroring? How do I get a refund because this is false advertising and a…
Terrible bait and switch — Limited on what you can mirror from the iPhone, this is a scam and garbage
Doesn’t work — Purchased specifically for my kids twister air…didn’t work at all. Immediately cancelled the subscription since it didn’t work. Requested a refund 2x and was denied. False advertising!!!
Reports of unexpected charges
Don’t trust this app — Lousy app. Apple wouldn’t stand behind it - or the slimy business practice - never intended buying it but then got charged 19.99 and no refund.
Does not work at all — I paid one year subscription and I was not able to use it at all because it’s simply not working. They did not refund me .
Worst Product. Doesn't wotk — Don't get scammed. It doesn't work to mirror your phone. Plus they refused to refund me when I told them it didn't work.
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 6 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.