Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 2,028 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 9.57.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 9.57.1, updated 2026-09-30.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.30 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.30, updated 2026-09-28.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Trial converts to a charge
Dear SCRL Support Team, I intended to cancel the free trial before it ended, but the subscription was automatically renewed and charged to my account. I have already attempted to request a refund directly through Google Play, but due to…
Charged for Free Trial, No Response — I was trying out a few photo collage apps to see which one I liked most for personal use and for social media posts at my job. I chose the free trial option for this app and was immediately charged…
Does NOT remind you to cancel free trial so beware — Ok app but I wanted to just try it out for a couple days. They inform you that they will remind you to cancel free trial but they do not and just charge you. A little sneaky imp but is…
Paywall blocks the basics
Greedy — It was great until they put half their features that they already gave you for free behind a paywall. Genuinely a butt app now thanks for nothing. Your greed sickens me. I won't be recommending this app to anyone ik and there's a…
Ai + limited — The app itself is overall pretty solid, but i’m cautious using stickers as a good chunk of them are AI or just locked behind the subscriptions. Overall easy to use and good for collages I just wont be using it again because…
Conan Lee Gray — It has a lot of features behind a paywall but enough to keep it free
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 5 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.