Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 437 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
We cannot tell which version of the app this analysis describes. It was run 2026-10-04 , and the app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version VARY, updated 2026-09-10.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Users describe the free version as usable
This is honestly the only game I have kept up with on mobile. it is fun, can be played in short bursts, and you don't have to pay to win. you can earn in game premium currency pretty easily once you figure out the market and join a decent…
Been playing since almost the start. Super addicting and NO FORCED ADS! The prices in the game shop are high, but you don't need to pay to play or progress. You can easily get by without paying for anything. Lots of events that add to the…
Took a break from this game for a while but have come back and am reminded of why I had originally loved the game! Would rate it 5 stars if the pricing was a bit better. However, I will note that to enjoy the game you don't need to pay…
Pay to progress
This is honestly the only game I have kept up with on mobile. it is fun, can be played in short bursts, and you don't have to pay to win. you can earn in game premium currency pretty easily once you figure out the market and join a decent…
This game was once a shining example of a high-quality and rewarding experience that, whilst somewhat aggressively monetized, still offered enough avenues for natural progress to make it worthwhile playing in the long term. Recent updates…
All the premium workers really kills this game for me. they're all super expensive, and given how integral Blueprint progression, and mastery is, one could argue they're pay-to-win. On top of the many premium workers, they've also got a…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.