We analyzed this app across 6 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
App Store
This analysis describes version 3.9.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.9.0, updated 2026-10-05.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 3.8.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.9.0, updated 2026-10-02.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 2
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 5
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Too much advertising. — Show me my orders and not everything else on the planet.
Tracking and data collection concerns
Confusing — Never says what’s being delivered or where it’s coming from. Constantly says something is being delivered even when I’m not expecting delivery. I don’t like it at all. The only convenience is making orders from the app because…
Hard to cancel
Easy to order, impossible to cancel — I have an order I placed in July (it’s the last week of September) with one of their affiliates. Have not received my product. Have received zero replies to my emails. The Shop in app systems that may…
Recurring order — I ordered Cuppa and paid through Shop now I’m getting recurring charges/shipments and it won’t let me cancel. Cuppa says I don’t have an account. So I don’t know how to stop these shipments
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Do Not order from Flahill. total scam. paid for a 'set' of golf balls ($34.99) and recieved only one ball. not sure why Shop even allows their business based on all the 1 star reviews about false advertisement. what is this...Temu?
absolutely nothing like their advertisement.
Alan — Do not buy this coat it’s a heap of rubbish nothing like the advert shouldn’t be buying anything else like this again
Reports of unexpected charges
Order something from shop. Said delivered but haven't received anything. Then it's impossible to track my package and or no contact information after sending emails to both shop and delivery company. Garbage. So no package no refund…
Need to know where my package is never received it never worshiped has a tracking number but that's it I need to know where my packages has a tracking number but was never shipped out trying to get information online and it tells me I…
DO NOT SHOP THIS COMPANY!!! I ORDERED 2 STRAIGHTENING BRUSHES. THEY TOOK MY MONEY SENT PACKAGE WITH FRAUDULENT POSTAGE!
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.