Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 1,036 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 0.5.50 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 0.5.50, updated 2026-09-30.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports of unexpected charges
SCAM, can't cancel subscription, can't delete your information. CALL YOUR BANK!
I felt scammed, paid for 2 weeks subscription, to try it but I could only watch half the serie in 2 days then only allowed me to watch 1 new episode a day
terrible, firstly 50 coins is too much an episode that has been generated by Ai, let alone an incomplete series and you guyz have the nerve to still charge people for this! second, you have to wait like 24 hours for the next episode to be…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Love the storylines I've watched so far, but don't appreciate the misleading advertising. If I paid for a vip subscription, I should be able to watch the full series, not be limited to one new episode per day. That's BS. Hate that I won't…
false advertisement. I got further on a show last time I had this app the trailer park to mention it showed that it had been completed. I have been waiting months for. so I paid for it so I can watch it. and when I was watching it it…
VERY DECEPTIVE ADVERTISING!!! I was under the impression my payment was for full "unlimited" access NOT limited viewing with the option to purchase additional viewing! Your company should be ashamed of themselves. I will definitely let my…
Aggressive ad load
This app could be better. once you've reached 7 ads, you have to wait till the following day to continue watching...or pay! So yes, it is free to watch, but you need a lot of patience not just because you have to wait, bit because the ads…
Good content, but too many ads 😞
Great stories but you have to pay to watch the entire episodes. Lots of ads too.
Hard to cancel
I have paid one week at 14.99 and another at $45 and still dont have access to the premium service. PLUS, you have to contact them to cancel the auto payments and they will not reapond! Beware!! The shows are good for the 5 or 6 episodes…
no way to cancel even following the cancellation steps in the help section. videos show 95 episodes but end after 20 saying coming soon. never comes.
They make it hard to cancel. Plus I bought a subscription and cannot I t even use it for some reason. It keeps asking me we to buy coins. I bought undercGoogle.
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.