What’s the catch? Hard to cancel — reported by 54 users.
Analyzed automatically from 3 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
This analysis describes version 1.0.116 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.0.116, updated 2026-10-01.
What the analysis found
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 1
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports of unexpected charges
What a waste — There is no way this app gets great reviews. Although I do enjoy the concert… The subscription price and the fact that I have to wait to watch a new episode. Every day is a great way to scam money out of its users. In order…
Cancellation — I’ve been trying to cancel my subscription and even followed the instructions on how but when you do there’s no where to cancel. I even emailed them and no response. It’s like a scam to take your money and you can’t even…
Terrible — It doesn’t not give you the option to cancel and will continue to charge you. Also it makes you wait to watch the full movie.
Hard to cancel
You can not cancel — The stories are good but you can’t finish them it’s a joke you have to wait every day to watch a 20 sec clip and than you can’t cancel the subscription your stuck!!
I’d leave negative stars if I could — Can’t cancel.
You can never cancel — I have emailed their account services 7 times to try to cancel my subscription. They tell me to cancel in the app but according to the app, I don’t have a subscription-so that’s not possible. They say go to your…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Not unlimited — False advertising!! A paid subscription does nothing to unlock all available episodes. The ads clearly state, subscribe to watch the full series- not just a full episode. The shows are all daily release so you can only…
DO NOT GET THIS APP. LIES. FALSE ADVERTISING. BAIT AND SWITCH — It says the weekly plan is VIP with unlimited access. That is a lie. They have Daily drops where after the initial free episodes then you only get another after 24 hours. You…
False advertising — After being multiple times charged still, I can only watch one episode a day. This is ridiculous.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.