Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-05 from 2,637 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 1.14.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.14.1, updated 2026-09-28.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.14.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.14.0, updated 2026-09-27.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
I downloaded an unskippable video, and questions, with a bunch off settings, username, age, and profile pic sellection. I want to open and draw.
so many ads bro
Theres too MUCH ads and I keep seeing the Dumbest Ahh girl and I'm turning of my WiFi forever please remove you Ads simply draw
Paywall blocks the basics
this was relly fun but now need to pay😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
its locked behind a MASSIVE paywall, and im filipino and 1 USD is 60₱ DX and it says its free on the ads, sure it doesnt have ads but if youre gonna add a paywall its better to be free with adds, bcz some users use ultra power saver mode…
i love how we have a go at drawing but i really thought it was free my daughter was done drawing then suddenly we had it to pay like the app is way to cool but paying is kinda stupid for me and only paying 12 dollers for an app! is kinda…
Users describe the free version as usable
Love the app, but there’s a problem — The ad for simply draw said that it’s free and you don’t have to pay anything, but you have to pay something for a year or a month it’s not fair. I love the app though it’s super fun I just don’t like…
Do not buy this this is the worst — THIS IS LITERALLY THE WORST YOU HAVE TO PAY SO MUCH FOR THIS $84. I’M NOT THE PERSON WHO WILL PAY $84 FOR THIS AND IT’S JUST SO UNREASONABLE JUST HAVE IT FOR FREE BRO LIKE I ONLY DID ONE THING AND THEY…
good but don't get fooled — i got this app bit i did not check thre review if your looking for an app that you don't have to pay for this is not for you
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 5 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.