What’s the catch? Paywall blocks the basics — reported by 35 users.
Analyzed automatically from 6 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
App Store
This analysis describes version 3.1.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.1.1, updated 2026-09-24.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 2.12.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.12.1, updated 2026-09-29.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Paywall blocks the basics
At least make it clear you have to pay to use the app. The 'tutorial' wasn't even a tutorial at all. All it does is force you to create an account and then collects your vocal data (which i want back, btw), and then that's it. It doesn't…
You've got to pay for everything, not a single free song. Dont get ur hopes up, first it seems cool and then u get ur test result and thats it. stupid money making machine.
You need to pay to use the app It's stupid
Aggressive ad load
waste of time. costs at least 65$ per year, not a free app. will make you watch 5-10 mins of videos before putting a paywall with no free option. scam, avoid.
The ads for this app are misleading!! Don't download, unless you want to pay for everything. You get the tutorial for free, other than that, nothing else. You can't even watch ads to unlock songs. You only have the option to pay for a…
you download the app and have to watch three unskippable ads for the product you are currently using. Then you don't even get a single test song to see how it works or if you like it. they ask you pay 59.99 right after their unskippable…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
advertised as a free app but is not, 60 bux annually
Bait and switch. app downloads free but after the hum exercise from the ad, NO content or songs are available without subscribing. not even one sample song in your range to try. this one's a big nope.
Liars. this app ain't free you can't even sing a single song without having to subscribe (pay) before false advertisement
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.