We analyzed this app across 5 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
App Store
This analysis describes version 6.2.8 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 6.2.8, updated 2026-06-01.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 6.2.6 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version VARY, updated 2026-05-30.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
States a price, or offers a one-time purchase
If all you want is a simple app to illustrate or doodle, this is the app (knock on wood). As a free app, the features it comes with are plentiful. No ads, no filters, no nothing. Just simple drawing. I'd love if they add new (emphasis on…
I love this app it's really great and it's only a one-time payment of $4 to get the other tools But where is the liquefy tool either I'm blind and I can't see it or isn't there but like most of my other apps if I use them for a long time…
The app is pretty good. I've used it for a few months and recently bought premium (one time payment). The premium has some basic features but some others are really nice to have such as lasso fill and folders. My biggest complaint is it…
Aggressive ad load
Great App — Literally the perfect app for drawing. Usually you see tons of ads and/or things you have to buy to use. Not for this! No ads whatsoever and the only thing premium seems to do is add favorites. All brushes are free and there…
No ads!! — People say too many ads no ads!!!
yay — Great app! Switched over from another app that got flooded with ads a while ago, and recently upgraded to premium. Some of the other reviews here are pretty confusing, though, since they claim the app doesn't have features that I've…
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Five independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.