DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Smart TV Remote Control Plus
DREAMTEAM APPS sp. z o.o. · Utilities

We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.

Nothing unfair corroborated · unauditedConfidence: High3 signal sources502 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-05
 Which version this describes

This analysis describes version 1.5.10 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 1.5.10, updated 2026-06-09.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

One source only — shown, not confirmed 4

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

From the store listing: Usable without an account
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the store privacy disclosure.view evidence
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
What we saw: The store privacy disclosure (6 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.
Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Aggressive ad load: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (1.6% of 502 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Hard to cancel
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
What we saw: Hard to cancel: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (1.0% of 502 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Declining an upgrade is written as a loss ('No thanks, I don't want to improve'), or users report being repeatedly pushed to subscribe during normal use.
What we saw: Constant upsell pressure: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (1.6% of 502 reviews scanned)

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Aggressive ad load

Doesn’t work try another one — Impossible to use without signing up and giving your credit card number for a trial. Too many ads. Didn’t work. Use another app. This one isn’t worth it.

1★ · App Store · 2024-12-30

I take it back!!!! — Right after reviewing the ads are so constant you can't move from one app to another without it prompting you to pay. Greedy Jerks...

1★ · App Store · 2024-05-11

Worst remote app on the app store — It works but you cant use it because they just spam u with ads so DONT DOWNLOAD DONT WASTE UR TIME

1★ · App Store · 2024-04-24

Hard to cancel

Hate it — I got this yesterday and paid for a years service and it don't work. I can't even get to support to cancel because they make it impossible

1★ · App Store · 2024-07-19

Unable to cancel subscription as it doesn’t work for me — I knew this would occur as I’m not into this crap from past exp

1★ · App Store · 2023-10-09

Hard to cancel — Not sure how to cancel this service. My tv has issue, not remote.

1★ · App Store · 2023-09-14

Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording

Free — Let me use it for about 30 seconds and now every time I try to use ANY button, it just prompts me with the subscription. THESE APPS USED TO BE FREE!!!

1★ · App Store · 2025-06-29

Can’t do anything without buying premium apparently — Every time I press a button (ANY button) it just gives me a prompt to buy premium and doesn’t do anything to the tv.

1★ · App Store · 2024-05-01

Deceptive — This app is not free. It allows you to download and connect to your device and then every button you press won’t operate your tv and causes a pop up to buy a subscription keeps taking over the screen.

1★ · App Store · 2024-04-28

What this app sells

Every purchase the store discloses. Store listing
 What this app sells

From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.

Subscriptions8
1 Week Premium AccessWeekly$5.99
1 Week Premium with TrialWeekly$5.99
1 Week Premium with TrialWeekly$4.99
1 Month Premium AccessMonthly$9.99
1 Month Premium with TrialMonthly$9.99
1 Year PremiumYearly$24.99
1 Year Premium with TrialYearly$24.99
1 Year PremiumYearly$29.99
Show 1 more purchase we couldn’t categorise

These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.

Universal Remote Control ProTerm not stated$3.99
This list is cut off. Apple shows at most 10 in-app purchases, and this app is at the limit — so it very likely sells more than we can see.

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-05 Version analyzed: 1.5.103 independent signals502 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.