We scanned 900 user reviews and found no recurring complaint patterns. Not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reviewers describe the free version as usable
Been using SnapCalorie for a few months now, probably one of the more accurate photo tracking apps out there. really easy to use! You only get 3 free photos per day on the free plan but in most cases that is enough to start your calorie…
The free version is amazing, the barcode scanner is super accurate and even when you describe your meal it gets the macros dead on 95% of the time. All the food chains are accurate and it makes counting calories easy, you can save custom…
its one of the great app for tracking your meals, offering so much for free that the other similar apps cant even think of, huge thanks to snapcalorie it is very easy for me track my nutrients. thanks to the app team
What this app sells
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.