Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-07 from 2,931 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 2.426.3-canary of the app, analyzed 2026-10-07 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.426.3-canary, updated 2026-10-02.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 2.426.2 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.426.2, updated 2026-09-30.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 6
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Fun game once you get past the numerous pop-up ads...would appreciate an in-game purchase option that did not interfere with the game.
too many ads. uninstalled
Money grab — This game used to be fun until it was only interstitial ads and needing multiple power ups and millions of coins in order to beat a single level. What a disappointment.
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
it is so frustrating 😤 when they give u just enough to play one maybe two otherwise u have to wait 1hour to play again especially when you're on level 5326 I think we should be getting better prizes and more money I love this game it's…
Good to a point — It actually is a very good game. I really really like it but if you go way up in this game, it becomes so difficult that when you do earn money you can lose it all and then you have to wait every hour to just get enough…
Scam… fun enough at beginning but too quickly becomes greedy $$$ — Fixed so you have to spend coins to move to next level. Coins price to get help in game are way too expensive. There is also.bugs with the games and coins amount against…
Pay to progress
This game was entertaining and fun when I first started, but after a while it got impossible to pass any level without forcing you to spend money for coins and powerups. update: I tried it out again and i had the same problem. Still an…
nearly impossible to win without spending money. the cost for wild cards for an extra five cards or any other power up skyrockets
This game is a scam!!!! — Do not play this game it is designed to take your more not make you spend it. This is gambling with no return. It’s the same concept you pay to win but problem is you don’t win because of the way the game is…
Price keeps rising
Developer controls too much of how you win or lose — I’ve spent a lot of money on this game and there’s a definite pattern. It’ll let you win for a while and then it takes you days to get through one level. I’ve been playing long enough…
Too expensive to play — Game is fun but prices are too high to purchase coins to play. It takes too many coins to play and to get additional cards per play. The prices go up every week to purchase coins and it cost more to play each hand…
Game coins — It’s true. Always have to use coins. Kinda getting expensive
Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
worse solitaire game ever. I always have to play a game at least 10 times to get past. The way the board is set up the only option is to lose or spend all of your coins on 5+ cards; which there is no guarantee the cards you need are in…
CONSTANT pop-ups and pushes to pay for things. Game also throttled winning opportunities on levels to force repeat levels or drain coins to continue. badically it forces you to drains the coins and either have downtime or make a purchase…
Absolutely ridiculous — I used to enjoy playing this game but now you cannot win anything!!! It takes multiple tries just to win 1 game. When you finally do win one game you are not left with enough coins to play again. Also, the first…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.