Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 958 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 1.16570.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.16570.4, updated 2026-09-11.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.16570.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.16570.4, updated 2026-09-10.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
you play like three levels and then you're out of energy.. DO NOT DOWNLOAD there's an obvious progression cash wall first time you play the game.
Great game for a different kind of solitaire. The main drawback for me is the limited energy per session.
I hate games that are energy-based! I don't spend money on games, and inviting my friends to an energy-based game is a no-go! The longer I'm away from a game waiting for energy to refill, the more likely I'll forget the game exists and…
Pay to progress
This game while entertaining cheats and screws players over. There are never enough attacking cards in higher level fights when you need them and never enough gold to pay for higher level spells. There is NEVER EVER enough gold to upgrade…
It's not enjoyable anymore. Way to hard to progress and the upgrades are impossible with the amount of coins you need compared to the payout received in battles. It's definitely a pay-to-win game although the Devs will claim otherwise…
spend too much money to pass level, just like those typical games, there is no way u can win without paying. also they charge way too much. I have been playing for over 1 year and the amount of money that I spend for this game just to…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.