What’s the catch? Multiple ad networks bundled — measured, backed by SDKs in the app package.
Analyzed automatically from 6 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
This analysis describes version 50.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 51.0, updated 2026-10-01.
What the analysis found
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 1
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
UPDATE: Was a loyal player, played every day, but thinking its time to move on. This was a game with optional ads and a lot of us loved that about the game and the ads even gave you a few energy bars for watching, now with the new update…
I can't even begin to tell you how frustrating it is to try an play this game! You open it, you have to immediately exit out of 15 ads wanting you to spend money, then not long after that, a random video plays you can't click out of... I…
DO NOT INSTALL! ADWARE DOWNLOADS ON ITS OWN. Game WAS fun but now Ads are disturbing. They are now too the point that the game won't start until you click thru 8+ of them. after 1 minutes to load/open, then I have to wait to play? Waste…
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
Animal feed runs out too fast. It's impossible to keep enough sheep & goose food made. That's literally ALL I'm doing every time I'm in this game: making sheep & goose food! SUPPORT BUTTON NOT WORKING! EVERY SINGLE TIME I OPEN THE GAME AT…
I enjoy playing this game, however I'm now kind of stuck. Because the tools I need to finish my buildings only come on the plane, which sometimes requires items that are made from the buildings I can't finish. If I was told how much of…
Liked this game at first, but just like Klondike game I got tired of always running out of energy. There are all of these events you must complete to get the extras that require energy you keep running out of. At first I didn't mind…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.