Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 1,063 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 3.9.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.9.4, updated 2026-09-16.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 5.29.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 5.29.0, updated 2026-09-16.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Paywall blocks the basics
Been using this for nearly a month and I have only logged two periods, the period week I downloaded the app and the one I had a month prior. I like all the various symptoms and journaling to keep track of your body and mood throughout…
surprised this app even has the ratings it does.as a whole I loved this app at first. I decided that what they offer as the premium options just weren't worth what they wanted for it.come to find out u can't even look back on past days in…
it's a good app and it's very intuitive but some of the features are hidden behind a paywall and I am broke I think this review explains itself k bye 🙂👍
Tracking and data collection concerns
So incredibly glitchy and laggy. there have been so many times I've opened this app to quickly check something, or give some information to a doctor, and this app just gives me a blank screen when trying to open it. It's annoying and…
They claim that they dont sell your data, but this was recently proven to be false. They absolutely do sell your private data to a third party company. Disgusting and shameful behavior. Be ashamed of yourself. Edit: Data is not end to end…
Despite their whole thing being not selling our information, read up on Mozilla. Selling your health information to outside analytics companies, absolutely disgusting and I am extremely disappointed. The app is glitchy and does not load…
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 4 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.