We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 2.46.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.46.0, updated 2026-09-28.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 5
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Please fix bugs — I’ve already watched like 10 ads and it keeps going back to ads and won’t let me watch
Trash — This app is trash. It’s ad based and the ads are way too long. There’s no point in even downloading this app. All they want is money they give you the first few episodes for free and then require you to pay or watch endless ads…
Good drama s — Too many ads
Hard to cancel
Cancel — No way to unsubscribe or cancel
Not enough content — There is only one or two drama shorts that interest me. Not a wide variety of content and very hard to cancel subscription.
Bad — Can’t cancel account can’t contact support to get help
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
False advertised — This app was advertised as free no membership needed with free to watch and no payments needed of any kind online. The episodes do not auto unlock without spending money or having a membership this is bs!
Terrible. Bait and Switch — This App is a bait and switch they claim free with ads but you must pay.
False advertisement — Clickbait show download and watch first full episodes. Should have an attorney view those false statements.
Reports of unexpected charges
I don’t like it. — I paid for the weekly vip pass online to unlock all content. And then downloaded the app and logged in. VIP pass is completely gone from both app and online. They basically took my money. Recommend not downloading.
They won’t stop billing me after I canceled my subscription — I have tried several months to get this company to stop taking money out of my account since I cancelled the service in June. They do not respond. I do not recommend this…
Scam — I downloaded this app and I made sure to cancel and unsubscribe! I even got a new card….and they are still charging me. And not just once 3 times within two days the price of the monthly subscription cost. How they managed to…
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 3 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.