Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 533 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 2.45.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.46.0, updated 2026-09-25.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 2.45.1, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Version 2.46.0 · 2026-09-25
No release notes were provided for this version.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
less than a 1 star. I cant afford to buy subscription, but I don't want to watch more ads than I do stories! I would stay away from this place! I watch a story today 57 or so chapters. Started early this morning and had to watch so many…
I think the only five star reviews are from people giving the review to get the coins. I don't know what it's like if you pay, but if you try and use it for free and just watch ads it's impossible to watch enough consistently to follow a…
fake ads. said free but failed to mention its was free if you watch their ads. and even then you only get 10 ads before its wants money. garbage app sold on lies!.
Hard to cancel
no way to cancel subscription
I CANNOT CACEL THIS APP IT IS TAKING MONEY EVERY WEEK FROM MY ACCOUNT, HELP HELP HELP I CANNOT CANCEL IN GOOGLE PLAY OR ON TBE APP STORE
can't cancel subscription show a nice weekend deal
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
if I can I put zero stars on it false advertising not free at all and 10 above episode you have to watch adds and the adds are longer than the one episode you have to spend money to just watch with no adds and its hard to earn coins and…
ad for this app was completely false and misleading. the ad simply stated FREE with no ADDS but its not free and if you want to continue watching each episode you either have to pay for the tokens or watch ADDS that they claimed to be…
fake ads. said free but failed to mention its was free if you watch their ads. and even then you only get 10 ads before its wants money. garbage app sold on lies!.
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.