We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 10.168.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 10.168.0, updated 2026-10-01.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Tracking and data collection concerns
Too much locations — This is a review of the State Farm App, Not the company itself. I am very happy with state farm as a company. This app requires precise location to be on 24/7. I notice the app polls my location way too often. There…
Constant data recording — This is basically a data harvester app for State Farm to sell your data. They updated their terms awhile back and in the new terms it states they're recording your data whether you're driving or not. I turned it…
Like a good neighbor… — State Farm is selling your personal information and online activity by default. You have to go into the app, or the website, click a link at the bottom that says something like “don’t sell/share my personal info”…
Price keeps rising
Exhausting First Time Collision Claim — Statefarm has lost my confidence with their claims procedures as they are hitting me with 20% liability for an accident I stayed 100% still for while being directly fronted ended by a clearly…
Don't force me to use a passcode (and the "cloud")!!! — I don't use the "cloud" (which is just a computer in some huge Data Center, sucking electricity and water- raising costs for residents). I never had a problem using my old PIN…
Deletes your PIN — Then makes you go in circles with the trying to add a new pin but never connects. Lost of threats of raising rates if you are not around your vehicle with drive safe and save be too
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.