What’s the catch? Multiple ad networks bundled — measured, backed by SDKs in the app package.
Analyzed automatically from 6 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
App Store
This analysis describes version 2.29.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.29.0, updated 2026-09-17.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 2.28.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.28.0, updated 2026-09-15.
What the analysis found
The catch list 3
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
ads are too much shame very irritating
To many adds and it's not free
two things I have to problem with 1 to many ads and 2 your ads are longer than the movie clips makes me want to delete the app
Hard to cancel
I have tried to cancel my subscription and have provided my UID # and multiple email addresses but keep receiving a message that you can't locate my subscription. However, it is charged on my card. I can't cancel on the app because it…
I really thought this app was going to be awesome! I was enjoying the stories until I realized a lot of them aren't finished or are repetitive. I go to cancel my subscription in Google play like it clearly states to do. unfortunately…
to expensive and I can't cancel my subscription
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
not free chargers you money to watch false advertising
So they say on the website $1.99/wk for the first two weeks but in reality, it only shows a week when going to check out. Definitely not a fan of a bait and switch. Beware.
these ads and charges are annoying not to mention the false advertisement of unlocked for 24hrs is just criminal 🤷🏿♂️ you got two starts cause the stories are pretty good.
Reports of unexpected charges
this app keeps charging me subscriptions, even though I canceled it, its not showing a subscriptions in my accounts and I no longer have the app, but keeps charging me
I really thought this app was going to be awesome! I was enjoying the stories until I realized a lot of them aren't finished or are repetitive. I go to cancel my subscription in Google play like it clearly states to do. unfortunately…
PLEASE DO NOT get any subscription in this app ITS ALL A SCAM!! I have to keep emailing them because I deleted my account and they keep charging me $19.99 EVERY WEEK !!! THEY WONT CANCEL MY SUBSCRITION. Please no Not buy anything from…
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.