We analyzed this app across 6 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
App Store
This analysis describes version 102.2.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 102.2.0, updated 2026-10-02.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 102.0.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 102.2.0, updated 2026-09-30.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 2
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
There is no way to cancel an order. it tells you to call the store, but the store i ordered from will not answer the phone.
This app has no way to cancel orders and no way to get help when you need it. their help chat is purely digital and gives you no way to resolve your issue. I ordered a sandwich and it the app glitched and switched the store I usually use…
Do not use — Do not use this app, there is no way to cancel your order if you send it to the wrong location while it is incredibly easy to cancel any order on any other app
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Bait and switch has offers that even when meet requirements as listed are blocked at checkout.
Horrible UI, and prices increasing while going through the order, no, without any paid extra customization. Your daily dose of false advertising, or convenient glitch that pads their bottom line? Who knows!
Scam — Subway runs specials online only. That’s fine, I signed up and joined the Sub Club. Nothing but the run around. The app runs you in circles and no matter how you approach it you can not access the specials. This is your basic bait…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.