DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
SuitU: Fashion Avatar Dress UP
Libii HK Limited · Games

Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-05 from 993 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

Analyzed automaticallyConfidence: High3 signal sources993 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-05
 Which version this describes

App Store

This analysis describes version 3.6.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 3.6.0, updated 2026-09-14.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 3.6.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 3.6.0, updated 2026-09-11.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 3

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Aggressive ad load: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (1.5% of 520 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 26 distinct reviewers (5.0% of 520 reviews scanned)
From the store listing: Usable without an account
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the store privacy disclosure.view evidence
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
What we saw: The store privacy disclosure (8 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Aggressive ad load

updated: previous issue was resolved .I absolutely love this App! my biggest issue is:if you want a Gacha- you will NEVER get the whole Gacha without using real money! I play every day, watch all ads, enter competitions, and completed all…

4★ · Google Play · 2026-08-10

I used to love this game and still do, however, many people pay for lots of things because its not fun unless you do. Right now people are on strike for Suitu being unfair and their last post on the Official channel was April 19, they…

2★ · Google Play · 2026-06-27

absolute peak. I was worried about ads but so far I haven't encountered any pop-up ads. They have a lot of different fashion styles that are all so beautiful. And farming for diamonds and coins in this game is actually a lot easier than I…

5★ · Google Play · 2026-07-30

Pay to progress

I've been playing for almost a year now, and this game it's a commitment. Yep, it's pay to win. I mean everything just becomes 100x easier for those willing to pay. But that's ok, my problem with this app...IS THE SPACE IT TAKES. Might as…

3★ · Google Play · 2026-05-22

Cash grab. Pay to win. Expensive. Sick of you. Developer response is a lie Edit: competition is broken. "Next" button does not work.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-04

this is one of my favorite games ever! such pretty outfits and so many different options for the gameplay. the one thing i have to criticize is that its pretty much p2w, the gacha sets are too hard to complete because you only get 15 free…

4★ · Google Play · 2026-07-10

What this app sells

Every purchase the store discloses. Store listing
 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-05 Version analyzed: 3.6.0 (App Store), 3.6.0 (Google Play)3 independent signals993 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.