Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 460 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 1.8.6.22642 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.8.6.22642, updated 2026-09-02.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Pay to progress
A Copied Game And Putten into Those Talking Tom & Friends and Put €250 to unlock, it's kind of free to every building but not free just a little space and the whole thing watch ads or buy for characters which is a kind of pay-to-win App…
I love playing this game It just has 67 and brain rot and it's getting to old i have been playing talking Tom for 5 years and they added brain rot and not just that it's pay to win
₱15,428 to buy the whole pay to win downloadable content!?, that makes the toddlers in a country, experiences the whole world? geez, I don't think that this is unwell. 😧😕
Paywall blocks the basics
I was a former Outfit7 fan but this game is Extremely greedy. 90% of the game is locked behind an aggressive paywall. Young kids get deeply upset because they cannot get clothing, pets, or items without paying real cash or watching…
This game is made for 4 years old and I try to playing and everything is locked no upset face a clothes is locked and I can't change talking Tom friends outfit I break up this game and I had done 💔 this game is sucks 🤬🤮
it's a huge scam. almost everything is behind a paywall. people are making videos about it. and it's manipulating children into buying it because they know that children don't know anything about paying with money on a game. so I gave it…
Aggressive ad load
This game is amazing I love it but the improvement is needed like there are too many ads and once we unlock that particular level it again becomes lock as we close the game 🙂
even through I like this App but everything is full of ad we need to purchase I like this App 20% of 80 I don't like this I wish everything would be free for example: toca Boca I really like that because if we need only we can purchase…
I was a former Outfit7 fan but this game is Extremely greedy. 90% of the game is locked behind an aggressive paywall. Young kids get deeply upset because they cannot get clothing, pets, or items without paying real cash or watching…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.