What’s the catch? Multiple ad networks bundled — measured, backed by SDKs in the app package.
Analyzed automatically from 6 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
App Store
This analysis describes version 7.13.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 7.13.0, updated 2026-06-29.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 7.13.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 7.13.0, updated 2026-09-30.
What the analysis found
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Update: Did an offer, got no reward, asked for help, provided proof, got told I didn't finish it. (repeat 1+ times) Asked why, told the same thing. Went to policy questions, told the same thing. I did read the requirements. I did the…
love needing to close 2-3 full screen ads just to read the content IM PAYING FOR. anyone please recommend me a better app I am so sick of this.
it's good, but I believe they use a lot of cheap tactics to make you spend money. You can't unlock all the episodes of any manhwa that isn't completely free without spending. You can't use ads to unlock every manhwa's episodes, only a…
Price keeps rising
This is not a free app, pay per page. App got bought by a greedy company, do not download, they will just keep raising the price till you can't afford it. They also seem to not advertise for any comics that don't overcharge. So if a comic…
The comics on this app are just getting too expensive, Tapas didn't even announce the price increase and just went ahead with it, and there are WAY cheaper options among the comic apps. - Edit: And now they've done away with new comic…
Good app. Hate the price hike. If I could improve anything it would be the free coins earned from reading missions expire too quickly! also the translation is decent but someone the manhwa name spelling is atrocious. Shatrine? Diareh? 😭
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.