Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Price keeps rising
App is great, new price is outrageous — The app itself is good, no complaints and the details are insightful. The problem is the developer more than tripled the price and it just isn’t worth it. In response to what the developer wrote, I…
Worth every penny until they increased price like crazy — I don't see the real value now with a $15 monthly charge, while other similar app like Stats only charge $5. And Tessie's lifetime membership is a hefty $400!!!
Nice app but crazy expensive — The features this app has will never be worth $180/year, that’s wild. Pretty though! Nice watch integration! Bonkers price. Edit: Dev has been fleecing with high prices for months with the claim Tesla will…
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.