DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Titan War
Glacier entertainment · Lifestyle

Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 400 user reviews. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

Analyzed automaticallyConfidence: High1 signal source400 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-04
 Which version this describes

This analysis describes version 1.0.118 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 1.0.118, updated 2026-09-22.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 50 distinct reviewers (12.5% of 400 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (1.5% of 400 reviews scanned)

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

Not what was advertised (the minigame is the only thing shown on the store page despite being side content) and the advertisement itself was intentionally irritating to demand engagement. Like another reviewer said, this is just RAID but…

1★ · Google Play · 2025-02-27

Definitely a bait and switch. advertised as a puzzle game when really it's 90% turn based rpg. ended up being a fun game. People complain about it being pay to win but im a F2P player and compete at fairly high levels. I definitely beat…

3★ · Google Play · 2025-04-26

Not at all how it's advertised. Sick of all the false advertisements with these games in the PlayStore and not one developer or company being held accountable for it. It's all for download numbers till you realize what the game really is.

1★ · Google Play · 2025-06-15

Pay to progress

Definitely a bait and switch. advertised as a puzzle game when really it's 90% turn based rpg. ended up being a fun game. People complain about it being pay to win but im a F2P player and compete at fairly high levels. I definitely beat…

3★ · Google Play · 2025-04-26

Never play this game, a complete pay to win trash with zero to no chances of getting the good herors unless you pay 100 dollars per hero (and you need 18 heroe cards to max) the heroe. Costumer service trash. Please never download or play…

1★ · Google Play · 2025-04-29

Very pay to win but still fun, after almost a year of twice a day daily grinds I'm still so under powered but with the cost of micro transactions U would hope to be more powerful

4★ · Google Play · 2025-01-30

What this app sells

Every purchase the store discloses. Store listing
 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. One independent signal is read — user reviews — and each candidate finding is filed under the source that supports it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-04 Version analyzed: 1.0.1181 independent signal400 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.