We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 1.26.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.26.0, updated 2026-09-21.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Advertisements — It’s a great game! However I feel like there is too many ads that play after a game or two. I understand you guys have to make profit somehow and I respect that, but does it have to be every second though?
I won’t play this no more — So this used to be my favorite game but we have to wait for an hour or minutes to play again and it kind of has too much ADS. Just no
Fun but way too many ads, even on subscription. — I do think the game is fun but for what it is a subscription for 20 dollars a month is steep. You dont need the subscription to play the game but my problem is there are just too many…
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
Some floss but love it — I really hate the fact if you die too much you have to buy energy and you have to wait a few minutes like in my opinion if you’re gonna make an addicting game you at least have to make it so you don’t have to get…
I won’t play this no more — So this used to be my favorite game but we have to wait for an hour or minutes to play again and it kind of has too much ADS. Just no
Love the game HATE the ads — I gotta say this game is addicting and fun asl. haven’t been a phone game guy since middle school but i’m on level 270 and can’t stop. only thing are the ads are INSANE… 3 X’s u have to tap off every single…
Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
Unplayable — You get pop ups to pay off the rip, and then a long ad before you can even play a single game. And their response to this will be that they know ads suck but they tailor to us and helps them grow. You can’t grow when people…
Horrible adds! — This game has a really cool aesthetic and is enjoyable when you’re in a level, but you get constant ads as well as constant pop-ups asking you to pay monthly or weekly or yearly to be able to play this game which is…
Nope — I played for 3 minutes, 2 of it was ads and pop ups asking me to subscribe for 8 bucks a week for this stupid game. You really think someone would wanna pay 32 bucks a month to play this? Get real
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.