What’s the catch? Nothing we could corroborate against this app.
Analyzed automatically from 3 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
This analysis describes version 9.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 9.0, updated 2026-09-24.
What the analysis found
Context 1
Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Trial converts to a charge
Scam — I signed up for a one week free trial and immediately canceled the subscription so I would not be charged, yet I was still charged after the trial ended!
Charged me for 1 month while it should be a free trial! — App is a piece of garbage! Tor onion not working👎
Shady… — Downloaded the app and it worked ok but very slow, not to mention that there is data collected about user content and diagnostics. I decided to upgrade and went for the option with the free trial and it said I would be able to…
Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
Used to be good but then made you pay for the ad blocker — This used to be a good free ad blocker. Yea the pop ups that told you to buy premium were annoying but that was fine. Now the only way to use the ad blocker is to pay. The free ad…
Cost money. — Free version has so many pop up’s wanting you to subscribe that it renders it unless so QUnless you want to pay for yet another internet service think twice. Do not recommend
The only problem is the subscription ad — I love this app except every time i open the app theres an ad popup to subscribe and pay 7.99 a month for vpn/tor, i cant close the ad for like 5 seconds every time, its very annoying.
Aggressive ad load
Suspect browser security due to continuous pop ups — Impossible to use with all of the VPN spam. I suspect the security of the app with all of the intrusive pop up ads.
Don’t Bother — Way too many ads, and clicking a text box won’t work AND it will scroll you to the bottom of the screen, basically making the whole app unusable.
Free pop up ad! What a bargin — It does literally nothing but demand you subscribe to it.
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 1 more purchase we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.