Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 402 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 1.1.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.1.1, updated 2026-01-20.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
It was fun for a while, but they kept adding more and more stuff to do each day, making it tedious and boring. The devs don't plan in advance. My town died because the player who was manager quit. The devs had no way to transfer manager…
Edit: anyone notice the new cover photo with a fake world warcraft t2 armor? this game is 100% bad. fake ads, fake game play, fake info, how can this game the claim it's the best rpg game of 2025? gameplay is all auto play, no end game…
It advertised as a digimon game when it's definitely not. It's also a pay to win game. Developers need to understand that false advertisement is actionable in a court of law. Since they're advertising this as Digimon and it's not I will…
Pay to progress
Original review was 5 stars because the game is really well made and fun. lowered to 4 because the pay to win is pretty out of hand. Ive played hours almost every day since launch of server and the top of leaderboards are 2x or higher my…
One of the better mobile mmos but heavy pay to win, if you are looking to be competitive on the leader boards and get into groups for new content you'll be sidelined for pay to win whales even if you are a very active free to play. The…
Boring game! Pay-to-win game. The more you spend, the more ridiculous power you get, and there are so many microtransactions in the game. I liked the game and had been playing for more than a month, but someone who just started already…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.