Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Pay to progress
I have played and enjoyed other games from this company. However, this game is not fun as all you do is spin your wheels trying to make a good team. You cannot advance because your players, although you had a good season,cannot get a…
Like all the others it pay to win. I had 3 winning seasons in a row and was fired after I went 8-4 and was ranked in the top 25. There are no bowl games for teams who are 6-6 or better. Only an 8 team playoff and you have to win your…
Probably my favourite version of their games, well balanced, challenging yet rewards patience, not pay-to-win but you could pay to speed things up. The only thing is awful automated time management in games. The game will call timeouts…
What this app sells
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.