Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 480 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 27.2.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 27.2.0, updated 2026-09-23.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
please take a look at your recent ads, there is an ad with an adware in it. I accidentally clock on it and suddenly ads pop up every 10 second asking me to download this cleaner . I am quite sure as I am playing the game and doing nothing…
Good game , but for some reason I cannot watch the free videos ads to get rewards 🫣 does anyone know what could be the issue??
too many ads but the core game is fun enough
Pay to progress
Stupidest game ever. Weekend league win all till the last 2 games against much weaker teams just so you can win the final pack. They keep doing it. The game is purely pay to win. You will never win a top 3 card available in any pack you…
overall whilst its a good game and will keep you going for a week or 2, after that. You have to wait for recharges which are 7hrs each (Rediculous wait time) and after that if you want to keep competing, its pay to win. its the only way…
grate game got potential but just gets verry boring just full of player vs player that basically it could be a story mode to it paying ai or something to push the game more instead of spending 5 mins on the game could be other things on…
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
Fun to play... Until you cannot play. All my energy has run out clearly a ploy to get to get you buy more... So I cant play quick games until it refreshes... a huge wait for league games 1 day+ I tried doing challenge to get packs and I…
fun to play, love the grind and the game itself. only complaint is the amount of games aday u can play and how fast you get the energy to play. if there was a way to get them without spending gems or money, maybe like a training thing or…
it can be fun and adicting but your progress is limited by just 3 energy per half a day... so you are forced to spend premium currency on energy instead of saving it for packs or else. and you are forced to *donate energy* to place high…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.