Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-06 from 717 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 7.3.32 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 7.3.32, updated 2026-10-05.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 7.3.30 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 7.3.31, updated 2026-10-02.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 7.3.30, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Version 7.3.31 · 2026-10-02
No release notes were provided for this version.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Updating -are you ever going to fix your dog$#it app??? Removing user created tabs that have been up for years to push your "pro" BS? users clearly don't want the surveys an adds. forcing me to watch ads Everytime I open the app is a sure…
I have never left a negative review like this, but this is genuinely the worst app I have ever had the misfortune of dealing with. Immediately it makes you complete this stupid sign up quiz about your interests with NO skip option and…
You can't just open the app and look up a tab without ads or going through their setup workflow (no skip option). Features are pay walled behind a subscription. I bought the paid app years ago for like $8 to unlock features and no ads…
Hard to cancel
I've paid for the premium pro version for years. I was a loyal user. They keep your credit card info, and they will charge you through auto renewal. I wasn't using the app much, so I decided to cancel. You can't cancel on the app or on…
You dont get much for the initial subscription. Impossible to cancel. It doesnt let you through the website. SCAM. The response makes it feel like a bigger SCAM. Bot response👎🏾
this app doesn't appear on your Play Store so you can't remove the subscription. I had to pay £39 even if I never used because there was no way to cancel the subscription!!! this is a shame!!! and I don't know how to ask my money back for…
Paywall blocks the basics
I used to use this app and loved it, recently reinstalled it and feels like I'm going to be immediately subscribed to paid free trial if I click continue. Disgusting and disguised daylight thievery in my opinion. I'll just use the desktop…
others have said it better than I can but the sheer amount of ads you face just moving from tab to tab is super irritating. also, things like auto scroll or transposing that used to be free are now premium features. It shows you where the…
The app locks nearly everything behind a 10$ monthly paywall, if you want to look at tabs good luck because you CANNOT without paying first. They have very few free to see tabs (not just chord things) don't even bother installing the app…
Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
constantly asking you to pay
one of the most greedy app I've ever used, every single small feature isn't accessible without paying, and every 3 second they gave you a pop up to pay for a membership 😂
terrible app. CONSTANTLY begs you to pay for a subscription. terrible tabs. makes you do a useless survey. the free version is not only incredibly limited but also slow and unresponsive.
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 5 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.