Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-05 from 809 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 1.8.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.8.6, updated 2026-09-24.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 2.4.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.4.6, updated 2026-09-23.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
I cannot recommend this game. Played for several months and unless you spend money you have to watch ad after ad after ad to continue the level you're on. Never enough coins to purchase tools and now the amount you can win has been…
I enjoy playing this game. I watch the ads to get help, like an extra box, or the swipe etc. I would give it a 5, however, after you finish a round you have a choice or watching an ad or continue. you would think continue means just go to…
its all ads and all rewards that are affecred at this point. and i have no idea how to attach a screenshot to this etc "This is ridiculous. Is there any point to trying to watch an ad for the daily wheel free spins, for an extra screw box…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
get ready to watch alot of ads or spend cash, completing levels reward is not even worth the coin you get, you get the same colors back to back, even on the so called easy levels, you can not complete without restarting or watching an…
Adverts for this game state “free of ads”. Not just “no annoying ads”. Yet, at a certain point, ads appear after levels. And that’s without getting into whether it’s even mathematically possible to finish certain levels without needing to…
uninstalled another screw type game because of all the ads. this was advertised as ad free and it was for the first while but now there are ads after every level. while it's still better than some other games I don't appreciate the lies…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.