What’s the catch? Hard to cancel — reported by 53 users.
Analyzed automatically from 3 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
This analysis describes version 2.30.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.30.0, updated 2026-09-28.
What the analysis found
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
SCAM APP — Do not get this app. They will charge you weekly $20 and there is no way to cancel. They are scammers!!
Reports of unexpected charges
Why do I keep getting charged — I don’t have a membership or anything, but you guys keep charging my card why?
Do not make any subscriptions — After canceling my subscription on my phones settings and in the app they have still charged me 3 times. They took all my money from my Apple Cash and have been still trying to take money from me 11 times.
Over charging — Even after canceling a subscription they will still charge you! I cancelled my subscription on September 13th, they still charged my account on September 18th then again on 24th. I filed a dispute with my bank. I got one…
Aggressive ad load
Too many ads — Just wanted to see the last episode didn’t let get there i had to watch everything again with too many ads
Nice stories — Good stories, but lots of ads and limited viewing
Didn't receive bonus's — I have just sat through god knows how many adverts earns 97 bonus and linked my google account for another 100 and gone back to watch the episode all my bonuses have disappeared I think il be deleting the app
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Should be sued for false advertising — You say free but…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.