Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-05 from 11,758 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 3.41.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.41.0, updated 2026-10-04.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 3.40.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.40.1, updated 2026-10-03.
What the analysis found
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 1
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
The game itself is relaxing and quite addictive. My issue is with the ads, which are far too frequent and long (and almost all the ones I'm seeing are from scam sellers, according to my product review searches). Edit: 1 week later- still…
Disappointing. Ads are too many and too long. Some are offensive. Playing suppose to help clear your mind and relieve stress but if you don't play extensively you get demoted. Not relaxing. Your time better used elsewhere.
This could be a 5 if you didn't have to watch an ad every single time you finish a game. EVERY TIME! And before any developers say, "oh that's how we are able to provide keeping the game going?" I did research, for the amount of players…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
false advertising. it is just mahjong which I do enjoy however I keep getting adds that this includes a different puzzle as well shown in the first few pictures before downloading as well. unfortunately as mentioned it is just mahjong
Too Many Ads — Fun and challenging game. However, there are way too many annoying ads. AND most of the ads are ai generated and many are fake. Buyer beware!
False advertisement — I thought this had the drawing game as it advertises and it don’t was very disappointed
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.