What’s the catch? Nothing we could corroborate against this app.
Analyzed automatically from 3 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
This analysis describes version 7.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 7.1, updated 2026-01-19.
What the analysis found
Context 1
Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
Charged me despite Cancel! — Doesn’t show up in apple subscription- their app has no way to cancel or contact. I sent an email ahead of the charge. They charged me anyway! No way to contact them. SCAM
They won’t respond — I have been trying to cancel this subscription for a month—I’m not using it anymore. For a month it has said that it’s cancelled yet it is still trying to charge my card. So I had to leave that card with no money on…
Scam — The app is not that great and on top of that, it is impossible to cancel the subscription. I won't be surprised if they catch a lawsuit soon!
Trial converts to a charge
Impossible to cancel trial — They make it impossible to cancel your free trial so you get charged and nonexistent customer service. Fraud.
manipulative trial — the free trial is manipulative i was charged seventy dollars because i couldn’t find where to cancel the trial in time. it was not located inside subscriptions in the app store like normal i’m sure this is a tactic…
Charged but no subscription found — I was charged after a free trial via Apple Pay, but the subscription does not appear under my Apple ID or inside the app. Apple confirmed this was an external Vixer charge, yet Vixer cannot identify…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.