We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 2.95.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-07 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.95.1, updated 2026-09-23.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
Scam — I paid for 4 weeks it took my money and worked one week. Now can’t unsubscribe, can’t contact them and it’s asking for more money.
Impossible to cancel — I have contacted these people 3 times to cancel, the first time was 4 days into the trial period. They keep charging even if you cancel. I would have given this zero stars but it wouldn’t allow me to do so. I am a…
Unable to cancel — Beware of signing up with this app- once in it makes it difficult to cancel, and will continue to charge you after any attempt you have made. It also will charge you without prior notice and without option of refund…
Reports of unexpected charges
Scam — I paid for 4 weeks it took my money and worked one week. Now can’t unsubscribe, can’t contact them and it’s asking for more money.
Misleading ads and poor customer service — There is no way anyone except the exceptionally fit will achieve the body the ads claim to in 21 days. It is a good beginner work out esp for seniors, but the app is not great especially the…
Worst app — Stay away!!! Did not renew, cancelled subscription and was still charged and told no refunds! $90 per quarter is a sneaky fee they don’t tell you!!!!!
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Misleading ads and poor customer service — There is no way anyone except the exceptionally fit will achieve the body the ads claim to in 21 days. It is a good beginner work out esp for seniors, but the app is not great especially the…
Nothing like the ad at all — Tried the app out. What I didn’t like is having to sign up for the program without trying it out first. Nowhere on the app were the exercise I saw on the app. Nothing worth my spending 40 bucks for. I’ll be…
False Advertising — This was promoted on YouTube as a weight-loss PLAN, but instead all you get is a self-paced tracking app. No guidance, no plan, no coaching on what to actually DO. It's not at all like how it's being advertised. Don't…
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 3 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.